In response to Harry's blog entry of 17th February 2012, we feel the need to respond.
We too are most dis-statisfied at the sisting of the case and would very much like to see a more conclusive end to the entire affair. By that, we mean that we would expect to see a verdict one way or another regardless of whether or not any compensation would be available to the losing party. We feel that this is the only way that a line can be drawn under the whole sorry business. So, in that respect, we would agree with Harry's blog.
Notwithstanding the above, all the bluster about trust deeds should be dismissed. We firmly believe that this should have no bearing what so ever on any outcome. Whether it has been hidden from the membership or not also has no bearing on the matter at hand. We have no interest in any other creditors. All we want is for the truth to emerge and the only way we can see this happening is for the Sheriff to be allowed to deliver a decision of guilty or not guilty.
We are also interested in the 2 court cases instigated by Harry and his cohorts against Danny Goodwin and Sean Donnelly. This has all gone remarkably quiet. Has Harry realised the error of his ways in either or both of these accusations, or are the cases still to be processed through the courts?
Over to you Harry.
